AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Sovanna at deja vu seattle2/28/2024 Much of the available literature on déjà vu at the time came from non-mainstream sources (and some were even of a paranormal flavour). Writing in the Psychological Bulletin, Brown described survey studies, case reports and theoretical ideas culled from more than a century’s worth of writings on déjà vu. I first became interested in the topic after reading the paper ‘A Review of the Déjà Vu Experience’ (2003) by the psychologist Alan S Brown – probably the first treatment ever to appear in a mainstream psychology journal. Now, research emerging from my lab and others suggests that déjà vu is not just a spooky experience, but a possible mechanism for focusing attention – perhaps an adaptive mechanism for survival shaped by evolution itself. Potential explanations have ranged from double perception (the idea that an initial glance at something was only partially taken in, leading to déjà vu upon a second, fuller glance) to dissolution of perceptual boundaries (a brief blurring of boundaries between the self and the environment) to seizure activity to memory-based explanations (the idea that déjà vu results from a buried memory). Along with the public, philosophers, physicians, intellectuals and, more recently, scientists have tried to get to the bottom of the phenomenon. Contact support (link is in the top menu bar) if you need further help should our algorithms have incorrectly blocked a genuine link of yours.Déjà vu, the eerie sense that something new has been experienced before, has confounded us for hundreds of years. If you’re a FeedBlitz client or subscriber then you should not see this message from an email that actually was sent by us, or a feed managed by us. And you’re here because we hate spammers and have stopped them.ĭelete the email.Bad people have tried to trick you by abusing a feature we make available to genuine web site owners. We can’t unsubscribe you, because we didn’t send the email to you, if that’s how you got here.FeedBlitz didn’t send you the email or generate the link, that got you here.Which explains why you are safely here, and not on some icky web site trying to harm you. Remember that bit of FeedBlitz they were trying to hide behind? We are now using that against them, and helping you by not letting you click through to whatever junk site is trying to fleece you, infect you, or do whatever no good it’s up to. And we really don’t like them trying to trick people by pretending to be us. We don’t like them trying to trick people. You got here because we really, really hate spammers and hackers. But … just because there is a link to FeedBlitz in the email, or on that site, it doesn’t mean it’s ours. This makes you think that the email (or link) came from FeedBlitz, a reputable email service. But they are using a bit of FeedBlitz to camouflage their links. The spammers who are trying to trick you do not use FeedBlitz. So: How did you get here?īut there’s a FeedBlitz link in the email, in the feed, on that web site! Yes. We didn’t send that email or make that link.īottom line: If you’re here, the email you’re looking at isn’t a genuine FeedBlitz email, or the link isn’t a genuine FeedBlitz link. We want that too! But we’re sorry we can’t help you. If you’re here and want to stop spam like the email that brought you to this page, or hate hackers tricking you with phishing links at malware sites, we think that’s great and we sympathize. And if you got this link in an email, since we did not send you that email, we can’t unsubscribe you from it. FeedBlitz hasn’t been hacked we just didn’t send you that email or generate that link. It was junk, sent by an unknown third party who is not using FeedBlitz to send their emails or manage their RSS feeds. The email you just opened, or link you just clicked, was not sent by FeedBlitz.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |